This study analysed the formation mechanism and characterization of the stresses with the common methods. X-ray diffraction method takes the advantage of simplicity and economy,but its penetrating ability is so limitive that it is just able to measure the state of resid-ual stresses at the surfaces of a body.Nentron diffraction method is able to penetrate deeper than X-ray and an internal stress is indeed measured by this approach,while diffraction volumes are required and only bulk average stress are determined.X-ray energy dispersive diffration method, offers both the good penetration and a high spatial resolution to resolve the residual stress gravients. It is the efficient approach.
Key words
metal matrix composites /
residual stresses /
X-ray deffraction method /
neutron deffraction method /
x-ray energy dispersive diffraction method
{{custom_keyword}} /
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] J. E. Allison et al. J. Mater., 1993, 45:19~24
[2] 林德春. 复合材料进展 (李顺林主编). 航空工艺出版社,1994, 1~10
[3] L. C. Davis et al. Metal Trans A, 1993, 24A:2487
[4] N. Shi et al. J. C ompos. Technol. Res., 1991, 13:211
[5] D.B.Zah1 et al. Acta Metall. Mater., 1991, 39:1117
[6] N.Shi et al.M et al.Trans.A, 1993, 24A:187~196
[7] R.P.Nimmer,J.Compos.Teehnol.Res., 1990, 12(2):65~70
[8] A.Abnh as an et al. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1990, 73:2474
[9] Todd. A et al. Metall. Trans. A, 1993, 24 A:1117
{{custom_fnGroup.title_en}}
Footnotes
{{custom_fn.content}}