1 College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, Hunan, China 2 Key Laboratory of High Temperature Wear Resistant Materials and Preparation Technology of Hunan Province, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201, Hunan, China
To study the effect of temperature and strain rate on the dynamic mechanical properties and microstructure evolution of 2519A aluminum alloy, the dynamic mechanical properties of 2519A aluminum alloy were measured by dynamic impact compression tests using the split Hopkinson pressure bar at different temperatures (-90-350℃) and different strain rates. The dynamic mechanical properties were analyzed, and the microstructure after impact was also investigated by metallographic microscope and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The results show that the impact flow stress decreases rapidly at 250-350℃. The deformation band is the main deformation character, and obvious dynamic recovery and dynamic recrystallization are generated, so the dislocation density is low. Adiabatic shear band (ASB) occurs when the alloy deforms after dynamic impact at 20-150℃. The strain rate strengthening effect changes at room temperature with strain rate 8200s-1. When temperature drops to -90℃, some short and discontinuous microcracks appear within the ASBs, and some long strip particles are broken by brittle fracture.
BAXTER G J, FURU T, WHITEMAN J A, et al The influence of transient strain-rate deformation conditions on the deformed microstructure of aluminum Al-1%Mg[J]. Acta Mater, 1999, 47 (8): 2367- 2376.
2
FISHER J J Jr Aluminum alloy 2519 in military vehicles[J]. Advanced Materials and Processes, 2002, 160 (9): 43- 47.
3
GAO Z G, ZHANG X M, ZHAO Y S, et al The effect of strain rate on the microstructure of 2519A aluminium alloy plate impacted at 573K[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2009, 481 (1-2): 422- 426.
GAO Zhi-guo, ZHANG Xin-ming, CHEN Ming-an, et al Effect of temperature on dynamic yield stress and microstructure of 2519A aluminum alloy at high strain rate[J]. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 2009, 35 (5): 881- 886.
5
CHRISTENSEN R J, SWANSON S R, BROWN W S Split Hopkinson bar tests on rock under confining pressure[J]. Experimental Mechanics, 1972, 12 (11): 508- 513.
WU Bo, ZHAO Man-xiu, LIU Ting-ting, et al Microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminum alloy 2618 prepared with new thermomechanical treatment[J]. Journal of Aeronautical Materials, 2013, 33 (5): 29- 35.
LIU Ying, ZHANG Xin-ming, LI Hui-zhong, et al Tensile properties of three kinds of aluminum alloys at low temperature[J]. Heat Treatment of Metals, 2007, 32 (1): 53- 56.
LIU Ying, ZHANG Xin-ming, LI Hui-zhong, et al Tensile properties of 2519 aluminum alloy at low temperature[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2006, 37 (4): 641- 645.
LI Na, LI Yu-long, GUO Wei-guo Comparison of mechanical properties and their temperature dependencies for three aluminium alloys under dynamic load[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2008, 29 (4): 903- 908.
11
XU Y B, ZHONG W L, CHEN Y J, et al Shear localization and recrystallization in dynamic deformation of 8090 Al-Li alloy[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2001, 299 (1-2): 287- 295.
YAO Jun-chen, WEN Li-fang, HAN Shou-bo, et al The dynamic mechanical properties of damping aluminum alloys under high strain rate[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering, 2006, (6): 46- 48.
MAO Ping-li, XI Tong, LIU Zheng, et al Dynamic mechanical property of AZ31 magnesium alloy welding joint under high strain rate[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering, 2014, (5): 53- 58.
2016, Vol. 44 
), 何圳涛1,2, 唐昌平1,2, 陈宇强1,2
