Please wait a minute...
 
材料工程  2013, Vol. 0 Issue (12): 27-31    DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4381.2013.12.005
  测试与表征 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
修理工艺对边缘封闭蜂窝夹层结构弯曲性能的影响
郭霞1, 关志东1, 刘遂1, 晏冬秀2, 刘卫平2, 孙凯2
1. 北京航空航天大学 航空科学与工程学院, 北京 100191;
2. 中国商用飞机有限责任公司 上海飞机制造有限公司, 上海 200436
Effect of Repair Process on Flexural Behavior of Honeycomb Sandwich Structures with Closed Edgewise
GUO Xia1, GUAN Zhi-dong1, LIU Sui1, YAN Dong-xiu2, LIU Wei-ping2, SUN Kai2
1. School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China;
2. Shanghai Aircraft Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China, Ltd., Shanghai 200436, China
全文: PDF(2953 KB)   HTML()
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 采用四点弯加载方式研究含损伤的边缘封闭蜂窝夹层结构修理后的弯曲性能,同时分析损伤直径、损伤类型和修理设备对修理板弯曲性能的影响。结果表明:所有修理板的抗弯强度恢复率基本处于90%以上;热压罐固化比热补仪固化效果稍好;胶接质量好的前提下,损伤大小对修理效果没有影响,然而损伤越严重,对胶接质量的要求就越高;修理后结构中央的抗弯强度恢复率比结构边缘损伤的高。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
郭霞
关志东
刘遂
晏冬秀
刘卫平
孙凯
关键词 蜂窝夹层结构挖补修理抗弯强度破坏模式强度恢复率    
Abstract:The flexural behavior of the repaired honeycomb sandwich structures with closed edgewise, was investigated by four-point bending test. The influence of damage type, damage size and repair equipment on bending performance of the repaired plate was analyzed. The results show that the strength recovery of all the repaired plate is more than 90%. The effect of autoclave is a little better than the effect of hot honder. The bending strength recovery with different damage sizes is almost the same with each other when the quality of bonding is good.But the large damage size need better bonding quality. The bending strength recovery of repaired honeycomb structures on the flatwise is larger than that on the closed edgewise.
Key wordshoneycomb sandwich structure    flush repair    flexural strength    failure mode    recovery of failure strength
收稿日期: 2012-10-16      出版日期: 2013-12-20
中图分类号:  TB330.1  
基金资助:中国商飞关键技术攻关项目支持(SAMC12-JS-13-053)
作者简介: 郭霞(1985- ),女,博士研究生,从事复合材料修理方面研究工作,联系地址:北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院(100191),E-mail:guoxiabeihang@163.com
引用本文:   
郭霞, 关志东, 刘遂, 晏冬秀, 刘卫平, 孙凯. 修理工艺对边缘封闭蜂窝夹层结构弯曲性能的影响[J]. 材料工程, 2013, 0(12): 27-31.
GUO Xia, GUAN Zhi-dong, LIU Sui, YAN Dong-xiu, LIU Wei-ping, SUN Kai. Effect of Repair Process on Flexural Behavior of Honeycomb Sandwich Structures with Closed Edgewise. Journal of Materials Engineering, 2013, 0(12): 27-31.
链接本文:  
http://jme.biam.ac.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1001-4381.2013.12.005      或      http://jme.biam.ac.cn/CN/Y2013/V0/I12/27
[1] DUONG CONG N, WANG Chun-hui. Composite Repair Theory and Design[M]. Amsterdam:Elsevier, 2007.

[2] NIU Chun-yun. Composite Airframe Structures[M]. California: AD Adaso/Adastra Engineering Center, 1992.

[3] ARMSTRONG K B, BEVAN L G, COLE Ⅱ W F. Care and Repair of Advanced Composites[M]. 2nd ed. Warrendale:SAE international, 2005.263-265.

[4] BELOUETTAR S, ABBADI A, AZARI Z, et al. Experimental investigation of static and fatigue behaviour of composites honeycomb materials using four point bending tests[J]. Composite Structures, 2009, 87(3):265-273.

[5] HE Li, CHENG Yuan-sheng, LIU Jun. Precise bending stress analysis of corrugated-core, honeycomb-core and X-core sandwich panels[J]. Composite Structures, 2012, 94(5):1656-1668.

[6] 张广成, 赵景利. 蜂窝夹层结构复合材料的力学性能研究[J].机械科学与技术, 2003, 22(2):280-282.ZHANG Guang-cheng, ZHAO Jing-li. Study on mechanical properties of honeycomb sandwich structure composite[J].Mechanical Science and Technology, 2003, 22(2):280-282.

[7] PIPES R B, ADKINS D W, DEATON J. Strength and repair of bonded scarf joints for repair of composite materials[R]. Washington:NASA, 1982.

[8] JONES J S, GRAVES S R. Repair techniques for celion-LARC-160 graphite-polyimide composite structures[R]. Washington: NASA, 1984.

[9] KUMAR S B, SRIDHAR I, SIVASHANKER S I, et al. Tensile failure of adhesively bonded CFRP composites scarf joints[J]. Materials Science and Engineering:B, 2006, 132:113-120.

[10] KUMAR S B, SIVASHANKER S I, OSIYEMI S O, et al. Failure of aerospace composite scarf-joints subjected to uniaxial compression[J]. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 2005, 412:117-122.

[11] TOMBLIN J S, SALAH L, WELCH J M. Bonded repair of aircraft composite sandwich structures[R]. Wichita:National Institute for Aviation Research, 2004.

[12] TOMBLIN J S, LACY T, SMITH B, et al. Review of damage tolerance for composite sandwich airframe structures[R]. Wichita:National Institute for Aviation Research, 1999.
[1] 芦刚, 查军辉, 严青松, 宋方睿, 于航. PA66纤维含量对多孔铝基陶瓷型芯气孔率的影响[J]. 材料工程, 2020, 48(7): 170-175.
[2] 史思涛, 陈畅, 郭政, 李国新, 伍勇华, 苏明周, 王会萌. 原料配比对多孔MgO/Fe-Cr-Ni复合材料性能的影响[J]. 材料工程, 2019, 47(4): 167-173.
[3] 陈敬炎, 吴甲民, 陈安南, 肖欢, 李国锐, 刘梦月, 李晨辉, 史玉升. 基于激光选区烧结的煤系高岭土多孔陶瓷的制备及其性能[J]. 材料工程, 2018, 46(7): 36-43.
[4] 卢国锋, 乔生儒. Si-O-C界面层对C/SiC-N复合材料力学性能和热膨胀性能的影响[J]. 材料工程, 2018, 46(7): 83-87.
[5] 许良, 费昺强, 马少华, 回丽, 黄国栋. 湿热环境下复合材料层板拉-压性能[J]. 材料工程, 2018, 46(3): 124-130.
[6] 聂恒昌, 徐吉峰, 关志东, 黎增山, 王鑫. 复合材料胶接修理层合板拉伸性能及影响参数[J]. 材料工程, 2017, 45(10): 124-131.
[7] 吕凯, 刘向东, 王浩, 冯华, 李艳芬. 短切硅酸铝纤维增强硅溶胶型壳的抗弯强度及高温自重变形[J]. 材料工程, 2015, 43(7): 56-61.
[8] 孙颖, 王国军, 张典堂, 陈利, 张明. UHMWPE/乙烯基酯2.5D角联锁机织复合材料动态压缩性能实验研究[J]. 材料工程, 2011, 0(4): 38-42.
[9] 陈磊, 徐志伟, 李嘉禄, 张刘飞, 陈利, 吴晓青, 孙颖, 陈光伟. 防弹复合材料结构及其防弹机理[J]. 材料工程, 2010, 0(11): 94-100.
[10] 李裕春, 程克明, 沈蔚, 刘强. 水中冲击波对混凝土结构破坏的实验研究[J]. 材料工程, 2008, 0(12): 19-23.
[11] 刘晓光, 陈大明, 仝建峰, 李宝伟. 烧结温度对8%Y2O3-ZrO2陶瓷结构与性能的影响[J]. 材料工程, 2004, 0(8): 44-46,50.
[12] 翟华嶂, 李建保, 黄向东, 戴金辉, 张淑霞. 退火对Al2O3/SiC纳米复合材料裂纹愈合行为的影响[J]. 材料工程, 2002, 0(10): 3-6.
[13] 王鲁, 李雪利, 王富耻, 刘国权. 功能梯度材料表面分形维数的研究[J]. 材料工程, 2001, 0(11): 25-27.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015《材料工程》编辑部
地址:北京81信箱44分箱 邮政编码: 100095
电话:010-62496276 E-mail:matereng@biam.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn